Key insights
-
1
Tactical success does not ensure strategic outcomes: Caitlin Talmadge said the operation showed tactical excellence but lacked a coherent explanation for how it would translate into U.S. strategic and political objectives.
-
2
Leadership removal did not change Venezuelan institutions: Caitlin Talmadge said the operation avoided regime change and left institutions intact under Maduro’s handpicked successors.
-
3
Legal authority remained contested and unclear: Scott R. Anderson said the administration had not clearly stated its legal basis, and he said the apparent Article 51 self-defense theory tied to narcotics trafficking was highly controversial and unlikely to be widely accepted.
Takeaways
The operation removed Nicolás Maduro while leaving Venezuelan institutions in place and leaving unresolved questions about legal authority and the path from tactical success to U.S. strategic goals.
Topics
World & Politics Policy & Regulation International Affairs Governance Security & Defense