Key insights
-
1
Judge Mehta cited generative AI as a factor in the case: Mehta wrote that the emergence of generative artificial intelligence had changed the course of the case.
-
2
Google argued the remedies would harm privacy and innovation: Mulholland wrote that mandated sharing of search data and syndication services would risk Americans’ privacy and stifle innovation.
-
3
Google’s AI search features face EU scrutiny: The European Commission said it would probe whether Google used website data for AI summaries and failed to offer appropriate compensation to publishers.
Takeaways
Google is seeking to halt implementation of court-ordered remedies while it appeals a US antitrust ruling on its online search monopoly.
Topics
Technology & Innovation Artificial Intelligence World & Politics Policy & Regulation Big Tech Law & Public Safety Courts