A
What happened
The Indian government's statement denies that the definition of the Aravalli hills has been altered to permit extensive mining activities. It specifies that the Supreme Court's order imposes a freeze on all new mining leases in this ecologically sensitive area. This clarification addresses public concerns following reports about a 100-metre height criterion being used to redefine hill boundaries and potentially allow mining. The government maintains strict protections to preserve the environmental integrity of the Aravalli hills.
★
Key insights
-
1
Judicial oversight reinforces environmental protection: The Supreme Court's active role in freezing new mining leases exemplifies judicial checks on environmental governance, limiting executive or administrative attempts to expand mining.
-
2
Height criteria debates reflect regulatory leverage points: Disputes over defining hills by elevation show how technical specifications can become focal points for either protecting or exploiting natural areas.
Takeaways
The Centre’s rejection of mining claims upholds legal and environmental safeguards for the Aravalli hills against attempts to reinterpret regulatory criteria for mining.