Union Law Ministry defends simultaneous polls proposal; says curtailing tenure not against basic structure of Constitution

The Hindu
The Hindu
6d ago 6 views
The Union Law Ministry supports simultaneous elections, arguing it doesn't violate the Constitution. This proposal aims to reduce election frequency and costs.
Union Law Ministry defends simultaneous polls proposal; says curtailing tenure not against basic structure of Constitution
A What happened
The Union Law Ministry has submitted a defense of the simultaneous elections proposal to the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC). It asserts that the plan does not violate the Constitution's basic structure or federal principles. The Ministry argues that curtailing government tenure for synchronization of elections is permissible, citing constitutional provisions that allow for premature dissolution. It highlights that the five-year term is not absolute and can be altered. The Ministry also addresses concerns regarding the Election Commission's powers, stating that it already has autonomy under existing laws. The proposal aims to reduce the frequency of elections and associated costs, which have historically disrupted governance. The JPC will further discuss this with the Law Commission and Election Commission representatives.

Key insights

  • 1

    Election Frequency Reduction

    The proposal aims to minimize the number of elections held.

  • 2

    Constitutional Flexibility

    The Ministry argues that the Constitution allows for changes in election tenure.

  • 3

    Election Commission's Role

    The Election Commission will maintain its authority under the new framework.

Takeaways

The Union Law Ministry's defense of simultaneous elections highlights a push for efficiency in the electoral process while navigating constitutional concerns. The ongoing discussions will determine the feasibility and implications of this proposal.

Topics

Politics & World Elections Policy & Regulation