The entire world was ready to reduce shipping emissions. Then Trump stepped in.

Grist
Grist 4M USA
The first global carbon tax framework was delayed after the U.S. withdrew support, jeopardizing international climate efforts. This matters as shipping accounts for 3% of global emissions and needs regulation for a cleaner future.
The entire world was ready to reduce shipping emissions. Then Trump stepped in.
Why it matters
The International Maritime Organization (IMO) was set to adopt a global carbon tax framework aimed at reducing emissions from the shipping industry, which accounts for 3% of global emissions. However, the U.S. administration's withdrawal from negotiations and subsequent pressure on other nations led to a vote to adjourn discussions for a year. The framework, which included a fee for emissions above a certain threshold, was supported by many countries and the shipping industry, which sought regulatory certainty. The delay raises concerns about international cooperation on climate change, especially with upcoming events like COP30. While cities and ports are taking steps to reduce emissions, the absence of a global framework complicates efforts to address the industry's significant carbon footprint.
TOPICS

Climate & Environment Climate Change Pollution

Be prepared — without the noise

Calm, decision-grade intelligence that flags material changes before they become social knowledge—so you can update assumptions, not chase headlines.

DECISION-GRADE INTELLIGENCE

Get decision-grade intelligence in your inbox

A high-signal brief covering what changed — and what matters — delivered by email.

A handful of briefs — before your coffee gets cold.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We don’t sell your email.