The cancer blood test making waves – and what the numbers really show

While the Galleri blood test shows promise for early cancer detection, its limitations in sensitivity and high cost mean it should be used cautiously and not as a definitive diagnostic tool.
The cancer blood test making waves – and what the numbers really show

Key insights

  • 1

    High specificity: The test accurately identifies 99.6% of cancer-free individuals.

  • 2

    Low sensitivity: It misses around 60% of actual cancer cases.

  • 3

    False positives concern: Testing over 26 million could lead to over 100,000 false positives.

  • 4

    Costly test: The Galleri test costs $949, limiting accessibility.

A What happened
The Galleri blood test, created by Grail, has generated excitement for its ability to detect signals from 50 types of cancer. In trials, it demonstrated a 62% positive predictive value, meaning that 62% of those who tested positive actually had cancer. However, this also means that 38% of positive results were false alarms. The test's specificity is high, with a 99.6% success rate in correctly identifying those without cancer. Yet, its sensitivity is concerning at only 40.4%, indicating that it misses about three out of five cancers. This raises the risk of false reassurance for patients. While the test could be a valuable tool in future screening programs, its limitations and high cost of $949 in the US suggest it is not a standalone solution for cancer detection.

Topics

Health & Medicine Medicine Public Health

Stay ahead with OwlBrief

A daily set of high-signal briefs — what happened, why it matters, what to watch next.

Newsletter

Get OwlBrief in your inbox

A fast, high-signal digest of the day’s most important events — plus the context that makes them make sense.

A handful of briefs — before your coffee gets cold.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We don’t sell your email.