Key insights
-
1
UAPA bail standard cited: The Court said Section 43D(5) prescribes a distinct standard for bail and said prolonged pre-trial custody cannot dilute the statutory bar where a prima facie case exists.
-
2
Section 15 scope addressed: The Court said Section 15 of the UAPA cannot be narrowly confined to cases involving explosives or immediate physical violence and said disruption of essential supplies or intent to destabilise public order or economic security could fall within its ambit.
-
3
Appeals arose from High Court order: The article states the appeals arose from a September 2 judgment of the Delhi High Court refusing bail to the accused.
Takeaways
The Supreme Court denied bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam under the UAPA and granted conditional bail to five co-accused, with liberty for Mr. Khalid and Mr. Imam to revive bail pleas under stated conditions.
Topics
World & Politics Policy & Regulation Law & Public Safety Crime & Justice Courts