Key insights
-
1
Court's Rationale for Relaxation: The Supreme Court questioned the necessity of frequent appearances, citing potential harassment for ED officers.
-
2
Senthilbalaji's Compliance: Senthilbalaji has cooperated with the ED, attending 116 summons since his bail was granted.
-
3
Future Court Considerations: The trial judge is directed to evaluate future exemption requests based on merit.
Takeaways
The Supreme Court's decision reflects a balance between legal obligations and practical considerations for the involved parties. Senthilbalaji's cooperation with the investigation remains acknowledged.
Topics
World & Politics Policy & Regulation Governance Human Rights