Key insights
-
1
Petition seeks written orders and rapid notice for account freezes: The plea sought guidelines requiring a written, reasoned order for freezing a bank account and intimation to the account holder within 24 hours.
-
2
Petition cites statutory reporting requirement to a magistrate: The plea cited Section 106(3) of BNSS and Section 102(3) of the Cr.P.C. as requiring seizure or freezing of property to be forthwith reported to the jurisdictional magistrate.
-
3
Petition argues for limits on freezing amounts without proof of complicity: The plea sought a rule that an entire bank account, or amounts beyond the alleged amount involved, should not be frozen unless the account holder is proven complicit in a crime.
Takeaways
The Supreme Court has agreed to examine the petition seeking uniform nationwide procedures and safeguards for freezing and de-freezing bank accounts in cybercrime investigations.
Topics
Technology & Innovation Cybersecurity World & Politics Policy & Regulation Law & Public Safety Crime & Justice Courts