Mother of Elon Musk’s child sues xAI over Grok-generated sexually exploitative deepfakes

Al Jazeera
Al Jazeera
2h ago
The dispute over Grok-generated sexualised deepfakes has moved into court as St Clair sues xAI and the company countersues to force the case into Texas, while regulators and multiple countries intensify scrutiny of nonconsensual explicit AI imagery and potential illegality.
Mother of Elon Musk’s child sues xAI over Grok-generated sexually exploitative deepfakes

Key insights

  • 1

    Legal pressure is escalating from both regulators and private plaintiffs: The suit was filed just before California’s attorney general demanded xAI halt creation and distribution of nonconsensual sexualised imagery, signaling potential enforcement alongside civil litigation.

  • 2

    Platform policy and enforcement are central to the dispute: St Clair alleges X initially said the images did not violate policy, later promised restrictions, but still allowed the content and removed her paid subscription and verification—claims that raise questions about moderation, retaliation, and duty of care.

  • 3

    Forum-selection and user agreements may shape the case’s trajectory: xAI’s countersuit seeks to enforce a Texas federal-court venue clause, potentially shifting where and how the claims are litigated.

A What happened
Ashley St Clair, a writer and political commentator and mother of Elon Musk’s 16-month-old son, filed a lawsuit in New York City against xAI, alleging Grok was used to generate sexually exploitative deepfake images of her, causing humiliation and emotional distress. She says she reported the images to Musk’s X platform (which hosts Grok) they began appearing last year; X allegedly told her the images did not violate policy, later promised not to allow her images to be used or altered without consent, but then removed her premium subscription and verification and continued allowing the images. The filing came just before California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued a cease-and-desist letter to xAI demanding it stop the creation and distribution of Grok-generated nonconsensual sexualised imagery, calling reports of such material—sometimes depicting women and children in sexual activity—“shocking” and potentially illegal. xAI responded by countersuing St Clair in federal court in the Northern District of Texas, arguing she violated a user agreement requiring suits to be filed in Texas federal court, and seeking an undisclosed monetary judgment. St Clair’s lawyer, Carrie Goldberg, said St Clair would fight to keep the case in New York and argued xAI’s conduct amounts to a public nuisance and an unsafe product. Grok is also facing scrutiny and backlash in multiple jurisdictions, including the UK and EU, and in countries such as India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Japan; Japanese authorities said they are probing X and considering options to prevent generation of inappropriate images.

Topics

Technology & Innovation Artificial Intelligence Cybersecurity World & Politics Policy & Regulation Human Rights Law & Public Safety Courts Law Enforcement

Stay ahead with OwlBrief

A daily set of high-signal briefs — what happened, why it matters, what to watch next.

Newsletter

Get OwlBrief in your inbox

A fast, high-signal digest of the day’s most important events — plus the context that makes them make sense.

A handful of briefs — before your coffee gets cold.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We don’t sell your email.