Key insights
-
1
Court criticism of urgency claims: The Chief Justice said a false state of emergency could not be created to pressure the court and questioned plans to screen the film without a certificate.
-
2
Procedural fairness concern: The Division Bench said the CBFC should have been given time to file a counter affidavit and a proper opportunity to defend itself before the writ petition was allowed.
-
3
Warning on committee members reversing positions: Justice P.T. Asha said a volte face by an examining committee member could create a dangerous trend and erode the sanctity of the committee’s decision.
Takeaways
The interim stay keeps the single judge’s direction to grant a U/A 16+ certificate to ‘Jana Nayagan’ on hold while the appeal is heard.
Topics
World & Politics Policy & Regulation Law & Public Safety Courts