Key insights
-
1
Structural backlog disparities hinder uniform justice delivery: The concentration of long-pending POCSO cases in a few large states suggests systemic inefficiencies and uneven resource allocation, complicating national efforts to reduce delays uniformly.
-
2
Judicial throughput exceeding new case filings signals inflection point: Clearing more cases than filed marks a shift from accumulating backlog to active reduction, reflecting improved judicial capacity and procedural efficiency under the POCSO framework.
-
3
Resource scaling essential to sustain momentum: The proposal to create 600 additional e-POCSO courts and significant funding allocation illustrates that process improvements alone are insufficient; targeted investments are critical for durable backlog resolution.
Takeaways
India’s surpassing of case disposal over filings under the POCSO Act marks a pivotal step in addressing judicial delays, but substantial challenges remain in ensuring uniform and timely justice nationwide.
Topics
World & Politics Policy & Regulation Governance Human Rights