Key insights
-
1
Gambia framed the case as centered on human impact: Dawda Jallow said the case is not about esoteric issues of international law and is about real people, real stories, and a real group of human beings.
-
2
Jallow warned that impunity risks repetition of atrocity crimes: Dawda Jallow said accountability is imperative and warned that impunity risks the repetition of atrocity crimes.
Takeaways
The ICJ has begun merits hearings on Gambia’s claim that Myanmar violated the Genocide Convention in its treatment of the Rohingya, with a legally binding judgment expected months or longer after hearings end.
Topics
World & Politics International Affairs Human Rights Law & Public Safety Courts