Fir or faux: which Christmas tree is best for the environment?

The Guardian
The Guardian
3d ago • 20 views
The environmental burden of Christmas trees, whether real or artificial, is significant. Using an artificial tree until its end may be more sustainable than buying a new real tree each year.
Fir or faux: which Christmas tree is best for the environment?
A What happened
Christmas trees, whether real or artificial, have a notable environmental impact throughout their life cycle. Real trees can be biodegradable and help sequester carbon, but their sustainability varies based on growth methods, transportation, and disposal practices. In contrast, using an existing artificial tree until it is no longer usable is often more environmentally friendly than buying a new real tree each year. Many Australians reuse artificial trees, and some businesses offer tree rental services to promote sustainability. Additionally, initiatives like replanting potted trees after the holiday season are emerging, aiming to reduce waste and enhance environmental responsibility. Overall, the decision on which type of tree is more sustainable is not straightforward and requires consideration of individual circumstances.

Key insights

  • 1

    Environmental burden of Christmas trees

    Both real and artificial trees have significant environmental impacts.

  • 2

    Reuse over new purchases

    Using an existing artificial tree is often more sustainable than buying a new real tree.

  • 3

    Emerging rental services

    Tree rental services are gaining popularity as a sustainable alternative.

  • 4

    Replanting initiatives

    Programs to replant potted trees after the holidays are being developed.

Takeaways

The choice between real and artificial Christmas trees involves complex environmental considerations. Using existing trees and supporting sustainable practices can help reduce the overall impact.

Topics

Climate & Environment Climate Change Sustainability