‘Existential and urgent’: what impact will ICJ climate ruling have on Cop30?

The Guardian
The Guardian
7h ago 1 view
The ICJ ruled that all states must address the climate crisis, emphasizing its existential threat. This decision is crucial for climate justice and accountability at Cop30.
‘Existential and urgent’: what impact will ICJ climate ruling have on Cop30?
A What happened
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivered a pivotal ruling in July 2025, asserting that all nations are bound by international law to address the climate crisis, which it deemed an urgent existential threat. This ruling builds on previous climate litigation and reinforces the legal duty to prevent environmental harm, regardless of treaty participation. As world leaders convene for Cop30 in Brazil, the ICJ's decision is anticipated to shape negotiations, particularly concerning fossil fuel policies and the responsibilities of industrialized nations. Experts are calling for compliance with the ruling and for fossil fuel lobbyists to be banned from negotiations, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability in climate action.

Key insights

  • 1

    Legal Obligations Affirmed

    The ICJ ruling establishes that all states must act to prevent climate harm.

  • 2

    Impact on Cop30 Negotiations

    The ruling is expected to influence discussions on fossil fuel regulation.

  • 3

    Calls for Climate Justice

    Activists aim to leverage the ruling for reparations and accountability.

Takeaways

The ICJ's advisory opinion is a significant legal milestone that could reshape climate policy and accountability, particularly at Cop30. Its implications for international law and climate justice are profound, urging states to take immediate action against climate change.

Topics

Policy & Regulation International Affairs Climate Change