Peer review is often regarded as the gold standard in science, suggesting that a paper's acceptance indicates its correctness. However, this perception is misleading. While peer review serves to evaluate the merit of research, it does not guarantee that the findings are accurate or reliable. Many papers that pass this process can still present questionable claims. The purpose of peer review is to determine whether a paper is worthy of discussion within the scientific community, not to serve as a final judgment on its validity. This understanding is crucial, especially as sensational claims often capture public attention, leading to misconceptions about the reliability of scientific research. The scientific process is inherently self-correcting, relying on further scrutiny and debate to validate or refute findings.