CSSF clarifies that ML/FT risk level alone does not justify blanket refusal of client categories
Supervised Luxembourg entities cannot refuse client categories on ML/FT risk level alone and must evidence risk-based, not blanket, decisioning
- — Onboarding and AML/CFT teams at supervised Luxembourg credit institutions must be able to evidence a risk-based assessment behind any refusal or termination of a business relationship — a refusal resting on the client's risk category alone, rather than expressly authorised by law, is inconsistent with the CSSF's stated supervisory expectation.
- — AML/CFT teams must apply alternative, proportionate measures for clients who present higher-risk characteristics or cannot provide standard documentation, in line with EBA/GL/2023/03 and Circular CSSF 23/842, rather than declining the relationship outright on those grounds.
- — Onboarding and AML/CFT compliance teams at CSSF-supervised credit institutions
- — AML/CFT risk-management teams at CSSF-supervised financial sector professionals
- — July 2027: under Article 21(4) of EU AMLR 2024/1624, the EBA and AMLA must issue joint guidelines on measures to ensure AML/CFT compliance for business relationships most affected by de-risking practices.