APG keeps Nepal's FATF ratings unchanged across eight Recommendations
APG kept Nepal partially compliant on eight FATF Recommendations, leaving its AML/CFT framework status unchanged on enhanced expedited follow-up
- — Nepal's AML/CFT authorities and supervisors must complete the outstanding technical reforms — across targeted financial sanctions (R.6, R.7), beneficial ownership (R.24, R.25), FI and DNFBP supervision (R.26, R.28), guidance (R.34) and international cooperation (R.40) — before a future APG re-rating request can succeed, as the current progress was found insufficient.
- — Financial institutions with Nepal exposure can treat the unchanged ratings as a country-risk reference point: Nepal's framework remains only partially compliant on these eight Recommendations and stays on enhanced expedited follow-up, which firms may factor into jurisdiction-risk scoring for Nepal-linked customers and correspondents.
- — Nepal AML/CFT policymakers, competent authorities and financial-sector supervisors responsible for completing the outstanding reforms
- — Nepal DNFBP supervisors responsible for R.28 risk-based supervision
- — Country-risk and financial-crime teams at firms with Nepal exposure using FATF/APG status as a jurisdiction-risk input