US Supreme Court rejects Sony bid to hold ISPs liable for user copyright infringement Change US Supreme Court unanimously ruled for Cox Communications, reversing a finding of contributory liability for ISPs absent proof of induced infringement or service tailoring. Why it matters The decision prevents courts from treating common broadband providers as de facto copyright police, blocking orders that would force mass subscriber terminations or continuous network policing to avoid DMCA exposure. Rights holders will face higher hurdles to obtain damages tied solely to subscriber conduct. Ars Technica · Mar 26 More actions Like (sign in) Save (sign in) Share Facebook LinkedIn X / Twitter Copy link
Delhi HC orders patent office to decide Ribociclib Change The Delhi High Court ordered the Controller General of Patents to decide Novartis's Ribociclib patent application and oppositions and to frame an SOP with timeline-bound disposal, within four months. Why it matters The Controller General must draft a standard operating procedure that sets disposal timelines for patent applications. The directive specifically covers the Novartis Ribociclib application and oppositions filed against it. The Controller is required to decide the application and oppositions within four months. Timely disposal of patent applications must be prioritized and timelines adhered to. Economic Times · Mar 18 More actions Like (sign in) Save (sign in) Share Facebook LinkedIn X / Twitter Copy link
Judge upholds Apple's right to delist Musi app Change A federal judge dismissed Musi's lawsuit with prejudice, sanctioned Musi's lawyers, and ruled that Apple's developer agreement permits Apple to cease offering the Musi app 'at any time, with or without cause' after providing notice. Why it matters The US District Court for the Northern District of California held that the Developer Program License Agreement authorizes Apple to 'cease marketing, offering, and allowing download' of an app 'at any time, with or without cause, by providing notice of termination.' The court found that Musi alleged, and did not dispute, that Apple provided the required notice. The court dismissed Musi's complaint with prejudice and imposed sanctions on Musi's lawyers for fabricating factual assertions. The court considered and rejected Musi's argument that other DPLA provisions requiring a 'reasonable belief' of infringement applied. Ars Technica · Mar 18 More actions Like (sign in) Save (sign in) Share Facebook LinkedIn X / Twitter Copy link
UK Supreme Court rules artificial neural networks patentable Change On Feb 11 the UK Supreme Court ruled that an artificial neural network can be patented and returned the application to the UK Intellectual Property Office for reconsideration. Why it matters Emotional Perception AI applied for a patent for an artificial neural network that recommends media files and can produce files to evoke similar emotional responses. The UK Intellectual Property Office refused the application in 2022. The Supreme Court ruled that a computer program can be patented if it involves use of physical hardware and found that an artificial neural network operates on hardware and could in principle be patentable. The court returned the case to the UK Intellectual Property Office to decide whether to grant the patent. Yahoo · Feb 11 More actions Like (sign in) Save (sign in) Share Facebook LinkedIn X / Twitter Copy link